PuckCast Edge
Betting edges, stake sizing, props priced against the line, fantasy tiers and the graded ledger. $14.99 a month in season, or $99 for the year.
Central Division · Western Conference
| Date | Opponent | Rest | UTA win |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 3 | at Maple Leafs | 1 day | 59%Final pick |
| Nov 5 | at Canadiens | 1 day | 54%Model read |
| Nov 7 | at Senators | 1 day | 55%Model read |
| Nov 11 | at Golden Knights | 3 days | 47%Forecast |
| Nov 12 | vs Blues | B2B | 58%Forecast |
Final pick is the locked call for that night. Model read is today’s read for a game inside the next week and can still move. Forecast comes from preseason team ratings and is replaced by the model read as the game gets close. Rest is full days off since the team’s last game; B2B is the second night of a back-to-back. NHL back-to-back schedule →
7-8the model’s record on Utah Mammoth games.
Utah Mammoth is #12 at 60 (down 5 since Sep 7). Scale is 0 to 100; each point is one published Power Index reading.
46.7%
7 of 15 correct
Bottom 5 of 32: the model has struggled to read this team. Take the picks here with extra caution. Full track record →
Each ring is one round deeper, so every number sits inside the one outside it. From 20,000 simulated seasons, before any games were played.
Percentile rankings vs. all 32 NHL teams
77
Offense
26
Defense
57
Overall
Percentile ranks across 8 dimensions. Larger shape = more complete team.
Scouting Take
The Utah Mammoth profile as an offense-first group that lives and dies by the scoresheet. A solid regulation win rate suggests they can close out games. Recent form is middling, treading water.
Every metric ranked vs. the league, sorted best to worst. Long bar = advantage.
Key Takeaway
Clear strengths in hits, offense, reg wins, all above the 65th percentile. Defense (26th) is the one clear weakness opponents can exploit.
Rank out of 32 teams in each category.
3.60 GPG
3.47 GA/G
+2
60.0%
7 RW in 15 GP
6-4-0
4-2-0
5-4-0
Upcoming
@ Maple Leafs
7:00 PM ET • Scotiabank Arena
8-6-2 (18 pts)
Win Prob
59%
Model Edge
+8.5
UTA Starter
TOR Starter
Underlying
| Strength | CF% | FF% | xGF% | xGF | xGA | GF | GA | PDO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5v5 | 55.2 | 56.0 | 60.0 | 39.6 | 26.4 | 30 | 31 | 97.7 |
| Power play | 95.3 | 93.8 | 95.7 | 12.3 | 0.6 | 17 | 1 | 109.1 |
| Penalty kill | 7.4 | 6.2 | 4.5 | 0.4 | 9.1 | 0 | 13 | 75.9 |
| All strengths | 54.9 | 55.4 | 59.5 | 57.3 | 39.0 | 54 | 52 | 97.8 |
15 games. Corsi (CF%) and Fenwick (FF%) are shot-attempt shares; xGF% weights those attempts by chance quality. PDO is shooting plus save percentage × 10. It regresses hard toward 100, so a team far from it is usually running hot or cold rather than good or bad. Percentages are coloured against break-even at even strength only; special teams are lopsided by definition. These are raw, unadjusted totals: no score, venue or schedule adjustment.
Roster
57
Overall Quality
88% Full Strength
-7 injury impact
79
Top Line
71
Top Pair
73
Starter
Standings