PuckCast Edge
Betting edges, stake sizing, props priced against the line, fantasy tiers and the graded ledger. $14.99 a month in season, or $99 for the year.
Atlantic Division · Eastern Conference
| Date | Opponent | Rest | BOS win |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5 | at Penguins | 2 days | 47%Model read |
| Nov 8 | vs Panthers | 2 days | 51%Model read |
| Nov 12 | vs Canadiens | 3 days | 53%Forecast |
| Nov 14 | vs Wild | 1 day | 54%Forecast |
| Nov 17 | vs Kings | 2 days | 62%Forecast |
Final pick is the locked call for that night. Model read is today’s read for a game inside the next week and can still move. Forecast comes from preseason team ratings and is replaced by the model read as the game gets close. Rest is full days off since the team’s last game; B2B is the second night of a back-to-back. NHL back-to-back schedule →
13-3the model’s record on Boston Bruins games.
Boston Bruins is #3 at 80 (up 14 since Sep 7). Scale is 0 to 100; each point is one published Power Index reading.
81.3%
13 of 16 correct
Top 2 of 32: the model is unusually sharp on this team. Lean a bit harder on the model's read here. Full track record →
Each ring is one round deeper, so every number sits inside the one outside it. From 20,000 simulated seasons, before any games were played.
Percentile rankings vs. all 32 NHL teams
81
Offense
90
Defense
88
Overall
Percentile ranks across 8 dimensions. Larger shape = more complete team.
Scouting Take
The Boston Bruins profile as a balanced, two-way team that can beat you multiple ways. They don't need overtime. Most of their wins come in regulation, a sign of genuine dominance. Currently scorching, one of the hottest teams in hockey over the last 10.
Every metric ranked vs. the league, sorted best to worst. Long bar = advantage.
Key Takeaway
Clear strengths in goal diff, point %, home, all above the 65th percentile. No glaring weaknesses below the 35th percentile, a hard team to game-plan against.
Rank out of 32 teams in each category.
3.62 GPG
2.38 GA/G
+20
71.9%
8 RW in 16 GP
7-2-1
7-1-0
4-3-1
Underlying
| Strength | CF% | FF% | xGF% | xGF | xGA | GF | GA | PDO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5v5 | 48.8 | 49.7 | 51.8 | 35.1 | 32.6 | 38 | 20 | 105.6 |
| Power play | 80.7 | 80.0 | 84.4 | 9.5 | 1.8 | 10 | 2 | 106.1 |
| Penalty kill | 7.8 | 9.4 | 4.8 | 0.5 | 10.3 | 0 | 12 | 80.3 |
| All strengths | 48.3 | 49.2 | 49.3 | 48.5 | 49.8 | 58 | 38 | 105.2 |
16 games. Corsi (CF%) and Fenwick (FF%) are shot-attempt shares; xGF% weights those attempts by chance quality. PDO is shooting plus save percentage × 10. It regresses hard toward 100, so a team far from it is usually running hot or cold rather than good or bad. Percentages are coloured against break-even at even strength only; special teams are lopsided by definition. These are raw, unadjusted totals: no score, venue or schedule adjustment.
Roster
72
Overall Quality
94% Full Strength
82
Top Line
76
Top Pair
82
Starter
Standings